Thursday, August 5, 2021

Rescuing the language

Basic terms. "Supply" is stuff on the shelf, already produced. "Demand" is cash money in a potential buyer's hand. There's a curve that describes how many people will pay a low price for something and how many will pay more to outbid them. A few decide that price is no object, which I did many times, paid top dollar to get instant delivery of goods and services in very limited supply (scarcity).

 

"Productivity" has nothing to do with human labor. It expresses how capital multiplies the somewhat puny input of workers. Take a 7-Eleven for instance, hundreds of thousands of dollars invested 30 years ago when the dollar had 30% more purchasing power. Real estate and zoning, construction plans and permits, plumbing, electrical, fixtures, tanks and pumps and refrigeration, a huge body of regulatory law concerning handicapped access and cleanliness. If sales are soft in a recession, the profit margin shrinks. Businesses close if they lose money. Wages are low until you qualify for promotion to shift manager, store manager, supervisor of several locations, or franchisee (if you buy your way in). Jobs at 7-Eleven are not good career choices or secure investment opportunities, especially in rough neighborhoods. A middle-aged blue collar customer in an F-150, grabbing a donut and a cup of coffee on his way to work, is not going to flatten a hillside barehanded. He needs a bulldozer, diesel, grease, qualified mechanics, spare parts, construction management, lawyers, developers, bank loans, and workers comp if he gets hurt on the job. He can't work as a heavy equipment operator without Caterpillar. That's capitalism.

 

Which brings us to "investment." It has nothing to do with Wall Street speculation in shares. Bidding up the shares of Pets.com or GameStop or Uber doesn't make a company profitable or investment grade, destined to pay dividends and gain share value in the future. Early investors in a start-up sometimes have a fantastic windfall. Most do not. Many ideas are stupid. They fail, and everybody loses their paid-in venture capital and founder contributions. Almost 80% of all successful investments are retained earnings (profits) from successful enterprise, used to expand operations, buy better machines, or buy another business from a failing competitor. After the Bell System break-up, AT&T was a high tech giant. It went broke, acquired by Southwest Bell for $1 and assumption of AT&T debt and pension liabilities. Bell Labs was spun off as Lucent, never made a profit, merged with Alcatel. The merged telecom device manufacturer went stupid and lost market share, a failure of leadership and lack of innovation.

 

"Innovation" has nothing to do with big operations like FedEx or WalMart. Rather, it means inventing something basic and revolutionary, like the transistor invented at Bell Labs in the 1950s, which made vacuum tubes obsolete. The first computers used vacuum tube logic. Transistors became integrated circuits by stepwise improvement of the invention. A large number of competitors worldwide raced to make transistors smaller and smaller, until chips were etched by robots in nanometers. What FedEx did was to compete effectively against molasses slow UPS and the Post Office, charging a premium price that customers were willing to pay to get stuff in a hurry, expanding the business model of "just in time" shipment of industrial freight, most of it delivered by long haul 18-wheelers deployed by hundreds of trucking companies and thousands of individual owner operators who make payments on a Peterbilt.

 

The only reason WalMart exists is cheap goods in China, daily arrival of container ships in Los Angeles, and hundreds of rail, truck, distribution, and maritime companies. None of those players are innovators like Bell Labs and RCA once were, both of which were disbanded long ago. Big screen LCD and plasma displays were Asian innovations. Whether Facebook invented anything is debatable. Google amped up Alta Vista, which was pioneered by DEC, long gone as a computer manufacturer. The computer mouse was invented by Xerox, an innovator who made important leaps and faded away. So did Commodore and Lotus. Commercial operators like WalMart and FedEx work relentlessly to increase productivity by deploying more efficient machines (bigger container ships, new planes for FedEx, digital devices and networks). Profits attracted competitors like Dollar General, Costco, UPS air hubs, and USPS tracking of 2nd day Priority delivery. Competition, cash flow, retained earnings invested in capital expenditure for faster, better service, and lean management pushes down prices paid by consumers like you and me.

 

Consumption does not produce anything, unless you buy tools and equipment, or a new suit to make yourself more presentable as a salesman, or medical care to stay in action as an economic actor of some sort, producing something of value or selling your labor to the highest bidder, unless you're a dodo like me. I invested my labor in doing work that nobody ordered. My consumption of food, shelter, transport, raw stock, film crews, labs, television cameras, and oodles of computers produced nothing that people wanted to buy. Presto! I was out of business as a film director.

 

"Government spending" is a shell game. They borrow, throw trillions around, earn zero profit, and the dollar is devalued. Prices rise because everything costs more to produce, burdened by taxes and market distortion, subsidizing incompetents and the idle to consume without producing anything, especially the tens of millions who are directly employed by government. You like to think that government keeps us safe and orderly. It's a lie. Our armies kill people and break things, always a costly disaster. Our cities are hollowed out. They were built by generations of private actors, private savings, technology innovators, and private investment in factories and small enterprises that are no longer viable in murderous urban jungles created and worsened by lavish government spending. Riots do not promote equity.

 

When I feel like it, I'll explain equity. It has nothing to do with racism.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment